2012年8月20日星期一
深圳新合诺供应链管理公司(Synergic Enterprises)
深圳新合诺供应链管理公司(Synergic Enterprises)成立于2004年，是国内最早的一批专业从事供应链管理的公司，公司的合伙人有前大型外资企业的高级管理人员，前大型国有企业资深雇员，以及多位知名的美国商界知名人士，公司的主营业务在出口方面为设计，制造供给美国大型超市的各类新型，有创意的家庭日用消费品，在进口方面为经销，代理进口世界范围内的农产品，食品，及各种大宗商品供给国内的大型加工厂以及超市。
经过8年的建设，发展，我们已经为我们的客户建立了新式的，稳定的供应链系统。。。
出口方面，我们在2007年建设了安徽生产基地，2010年建设了江苏生产基地，并且陆续通过了多家美国大型连锁企业（HOME DEPOT，BIG LOTS 等）的验厂，我们与客户共同研发制造的产品已经进入美国几十个品牌超市，在几千家店面销售我们的产品。
进口方面，我们经营的品种有南美大豆，及相关制品，世界范围内的冻货产品诸如鸡肉，鸡爪，鸡杂类，猪，牛，羊肉类，杂类，世界范围内的水果，诸如，蓝莓，车厘子，香蕉等，美国的干果类，诸如，杏仁，开心果，山核桃等，以及美国，加拿大，澳大利亚的不同种类的龙虾。我们协助国外的合作伙伴取得了各种类中国进口需要的证书，资质，并且我们自己也取得了非常全面的各种类进口的资质，证书等。
新合诺企业2011年度总营业额为2.4亿港币在香港，深圳， 合肥当地都有银行的大额授信，我们有能力满足客户的各种需求，也希望能与所有的老客户，新客户合作，创造我们共同特有的价值体系！
For general info please contact info@s-scm.com
For sales inquiry please contact sales@s-scm.com
更多信息请访问我们的网站：http://s-scm.com
2012年8月10日星期五
深圳新合诺供应链管理公司
深圳新合诺供应链管理公司成立于2004年，是国内最早的一批专业从事供应链管理的公司，公司的合伙人有前大型外资企业的高级管理人员，前大型国有企业资深雇员，以及多位知名的美国商界知名人士，公司的主营业务在出口方面为设计，制造供给美国大型超市的各类新型，有创意的家庭日用消费品，在进口方面为经销，代理进口世界范围内的农产品，食品，及各种大宗商品供给国内的大型加工厂以及超市。
经过8年的建设，发展，我们已经为我们的客户建立了新式的，稳定的供应链系统。。。
出口方面，我们在2007年建设了安徽生产基地，2010年建设了江苏生产基地，并且陆续通过了多家美国大型连锁企业（HOME DEPOT，BIG LOTS 等）的验厂，我们与客户共同研发制造的产品已经进入美国几十个品牌超市，在几千家店面销售我们的产品。
进口方面，我们经营的品种有南美大豆，及相关制品，世界范围内的冻货产品诸如鸡肉，鸡爪，鸡杂类，猪，牛，羊肉类，杂类，世界范围内的水果，诸如，蓝莓，车厘子，香蕉等，美国的干果类，诸如，杏仁，开心果，山核桃等，以及美国，加拿大，澳大利亚的不同种类的龙虾。我们协助国外的合作伙伴取得了各种类中国进口需要的证书，资质，并且我们自己也取得了非常全面的各种类进口的资质，证书等。
新合诺企业2011年度总营业额为2.4亿港币在香港，深圳， 合肥当地都有银行的大额授信，我们有能力满足客户的各种需求，也希望能与所有的老客户，新客户合作，创造我们共同特有的价值体系！
For general info please contact info@s-scm.com
For sales inquiry please contact sales@s-scm.com
Your inquiry will be get response in less than 24 hours!
2012年7月15日星期日
Is the Prediction that “99% of Small and Medium Enterprises Will Die” Just Alarmist Talk?
While in Beijing this past winter, the high-profile Jiangsu tycoon Yan Jiehe offered the prediction that there will also be a “winter” for China’s SMEs: In the coming 5 to 10 years, 99% of SMEs will die. This journalist has interviewed Yan Jiehe numerous times and he has consistently and intensely insisted upon this view.
Yan Jiehe’s view has a macroeconomic context: 30 years after the Reform and Opening up, China’s economy is in a period of major transformation. This transformation is the transformation of the economy from disorder to order, from pursuing quantity to pursuing quality. It is precisely against this backdrop that the “Labor Contract Law” was passed and the country has begun vigorously advocating the conservation of energy and reduction of emissions. SMEs, without exception, will be severely impacted.
There is already a case that supports Yan Jiehe’s viewpoint. China’s home appliances industry at one time was vast, with over 40,000 companies in 1992, but by 2002, only around 400 companies were left, and by 2007, there were only around 100 companies. The survival rate is 0.2%, with 99.8% of companies having died off. With this many enterprises gone, is there any shortage of home appliances in the market? No, and it remains a buyer’s market. Henceforth, China’s SMEs will all face the same predicament the home appliances industry has gone through, where the vast majority of SMEs will die in the midst of of intense market competition.
During Yan Jiehe’s lecture, both guests and reporters asked the same question: Under 2008′s tightening monetary policy, financing for SMEs will be even more difficult, so how should this difficulty be solved? In the face of this question, Yan Jiehe’s response was very blunt, “There’s nothing you can do, don’t harbor any delusions.”
What do you think of Yan JIehe’s views?
Reproduced from Synergic Enterprises:http://s-scm.com/blog/prediction-99-small-medium-enterprises-die-alarmist-talk/
Proview Founder Says iPad Trademark Case May Be Resolved Within 2 Months
May 10th morning news, after Proview’s suit against Apple for infringing upon its iPad trademark was rejected by a local court a few days ago, Proview founding Yang Rongshan said Proview’s American lawyers are leaning towards an appeal but concrete plans are still under research. At the same time, he indicated hope that the iPad trademark case in China will be resolved inside of 2 months.
This February, Proview launched a lawsuit against Apple in the United States, accusing Apple of deceptive practices when Apple purchased the iPad trademark several years ago, and as a result should not enjoy the rights over this trademark. May 4th, a high-level United States California court rejected Proview’s lawsuit at the request of Apple, because both parties originally agreed that legal disputes would be resolved in Hong Kong.
During an interview with Sina Technology yesterday, Yang Rongshan said Proview’s American lawyers are leaning towards an appeal but concrete plans are still under research. At the same time, he indicated that the dispute surrounding the iPad trademark has hope of being resolved within 1-2 months.
According to reports, the China iPad trademark case that has been going on for two years at present has already entered court-supervised mediation procedures with both Proview and Apple expressing willingness to settle. However, both parties are still very far apart on the sum of settlement.
Yang Rongshan refused to disclose Proview’s asking price, but indicated that it must get as much as possible, because Proview must consider multiple factors. Yang Rongshan indicated that he hopes the iPad trademark dispute can be resolved as soon as possible.
The lawyer representing Proview, Xie Xianghui, disclosed that the Guangdong provincial high court is currently doing a lot of mediation work, so that both parties can come to an agreement on the settlement sum, but at present the gap between the sums is still “relatively large”.
He continued to say that at present both parties have hopes of a successful mediation, but is unable to predict a specific time for when it will be resolved.
This weekend, Apple’s new iPad will go on sale in Brazil and 30 other countries and regions, bringing this kind of product to nearly 90 countries and regions. Although the new iPad had obtained approval for sale within China in March, it remains missing from the latest list of products to be released onto the market.
At present, the Guangdong high court announced that it will fully consider social benefits, legal benefits, and other various factors in this iPad trademark dispute and handle this matter justly in accordance with law, seeking to maximize both parties’ interests.
Five Reasons China’s Banks Are Not Taking Over The U.S. Banking System
A man walks out of an ATM of a branch of China’s banking giant Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) in Shanghai on January 18, 2011. According reports, ICBC plans to open branches in Europe to expands its network in the region. (Image credit: AFP/Getty Images via @daylife)
The Federal Reserve’s decision this week to green light the expansion plans of three massive state-owned Chinese banks, including the first-ever takeover of a group of U.S. bank branches by a Chinese lender, got tremendous media attention and seemed to play into general fears about China flexing its muscles in America’s backyard.
But while China’s big banks and some parts of China’s government appear to be trying to play a bigger role in the global financial system, China’s banks will not play a meaningful role in the U.S. any time soon. Here are five reasons why:
1. China is going through its once-in-a-decade power transfer and things are not going smoothly. The Chinese Communist Party is dealing with the downfall of Bo Xilai, being embarrassed by a single blind activist, Chen Guangcheng, and an economy that might require more government spending to keep humming. This is not the time in Beijing for a big U.S. banking push.
2. China’s banks really don’t know how to operate in foreign markets like the U.S. They lack the manpower to adequately staff U.S. branches and assess credit risk. It will take a very long time for them to build up these capabilities.
3. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China might be the world’s most profitable lender, but its deal for 80% of the U.S. unit of Bank of East Asia is tiny. It’s a $140 million transaction and the whole retail network ICBC is acquiring has less than $800 million in assets. This is a symbolic gesture at best and totally meaningless to ICBC, which has $2.5 trillion in assets.
4. China’s banks are huge and very profitable, but it’s unclear that they are strong enough for a big U.S. move. Carl Walter, who spent 20 years manning banking outposts in China for companies like JPMorgan Chase & Co.,recently even said that “their capitalization is insufficient to move from where they are now to something else.” China’s banks will soon have to deal with the fall out from the $3 trillion in loans they put into China’s economy on the government’s orders following the financial crisis. And Walter likes to remind people that China’s banking profits are artificially generated by government-administered interest rates and the fact that China’s savers have nowhere else to put their money.
5. There is a growing domestic backlash against China’s big banks in China that will both limit their growth and force them to lend more domestically to Chinese entrepreneurs in the private sector. China’s big banks have shunned the nation’s own entrepreneurs, resulting in a huge and highly-priced gray lending market in China.Wen Jiabao himself, China’s outgoing Premier, complained in April that China’s banks make money “far too easily” and should be broken up. “To allow private capital to flow into finance,” he said, “basically we need to break up the monopoly.”
China’s big banks will try to follow their customers, Chinese companies, in foreign markets like the U.S. and provide them with financing. To be sure, Jamie Dimon and even Vikram Pandit are not worrying about competition in America from China’s banks.
2012 Overview of Minimum Wages in 32 Provinces and Cities, Shenzhen Highest, Hainan at the Bottom
China News Service April 27th report (Finance Channel, Li Jinlei). On the 25th, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security spokesperson Yin Chengji revealed that currently the highest monthly minimum wage is 1500 yuan in Shenzhen and the highest hourly minimum wage is 14 yuan in Beijing. China New Service Finance Channel hereby presents the current minimum wage standards of 32 provinces and cities.
The rankings show that as of April 26th, the highest monthly minimum wage is in Shenzhen at 1500 yuan, the second is in Shanghai at 1450 yuan, and Tianjin and Zhejiang both at 1310 yuan in third place; The four provinces/cities of Heilongjiang, Chongqing, Jiangxi, and Hainan are in the bottom four spots, all lower than 900 yuan. For hourly minimum wage, the highest is in Beijing at 14 yuan, with second and third place being Shenzhen and Tianjin, and the bottom three places belonging to Jilin, Heilongjiang, and Hainan all under 8 yuan. Worth nothing is that the monthly minimum wage in Hainan has not been adjusted since 2011, and its current 830 yuan monthly minimum wage and 7.2 yuan hourly minimum wage are both ranked last.
14 provinces and cities adjusted their minimum wages in 2012
From 2012 January 1st, Beijing, Sichuan, Jiangxi, and Shaanxi took the lead in adjusting their minimum wages. Beijing city’s minimum wage was adjusted from 1160 yuan each month to 1260 yuan, with non-full-time employee hourly minimum wages increased from 13 yuan per hour to 14 yuan. Sichuan province’s monthly minimum wage was adjusted from 850 yuan each month to 1050 yuan, with non-full-time employee hourly minimum wages adjusted from 8.9 yuan to 11 yuan. Jiangxi province’s minimum wage was adjusted to 870 yuan/month and 8.7 yuan/hour for part-time workers. Shaanxi province adjusted the minimum wage upwards with full-time workers earning 1000 yuan/month and part-time workers earning 10.0 yuan/hour.
From February 1st, the minimum wage for full-time workers in Shenzhen was raised to 1500 yuan/month while the hourly minimum wage for part-time workers was increased to 13.3 yuan/hour.
From March 1st, the monthly minimum wage in Shandong province was increased from the previous 1100 yuan, 950 yuan, and 800 yuan to 1240 yuan, 1100 yuan, and 950 yuan. Hourly minimum wages have been set at 13 yuan, 11 yuan, and 10 yuan.
From April 1st, the monthly minimum wage for Shanghai city workers was adjusted from 1280 yuan to 1450 yuan, while the minimum hourly wage from adjusted from 11 yuan to 12.5 yuan. The monthly minimum wage in Tianjin city increased from 1160 yuan to 1310 yuan, and the minimum hourly wage was adjusted from 11.6 yuan to 13.1 yuan. The monthly minimum wage in Guangxi was increased from 820 yuan to 1000 yuan, and the minimum hourly wage was also increased from the original 6 yuan to 8.5 yuan. The monthly minimum wage in Ningxia was adjusted from 900 yuan to 1100 yuan, while the hourly minimum wage was adjusted from 9 yuan to 11 yuan. The monthly minimum wage in Gansu province was increased to 980 yuan, and its hourly minimum wage was increased to 10.3 yuan. The monthly minimum wage in Shanxi province was adjusted upward to 1125 yuan, while its hourly minimum wage was increased to to 6.5 yuan.
No further adjustments for Hainan and 3 other provinces/cities since 2010
2011 December 29th, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Minister Yin Weimin said in a national human resources and social security conference that a total of 24 provinces adjusted their minimum wage during the year with an average increase of 22%.
However, Hainan, Heilongjiang, and Tibet did not join in. At present, the minimum wages in effect for Hainan, Heilongjiang, and Tibet are still those following the 2010 July 1st adjustment.
。
Among them, the current monthly minimum wage in Hainan is 830 yuan while the hourly minimum wage is 7.5 yuan, ranked at the very bottom. Heilongjiang’s current monthly minimum wage is 880 yuan, and its hourly minimum wage is 8.5 yuan. Tibet’s current monthly minimum wage is 950 yuan, and its hourly minimum wage is 8.5 yuan.
According to reports, Hainan has already put raising the minimum wage on its agenda. Heilongjian too has proposed a normalizing wage growth mechanism where worker income levels are to reasonably and quickly increase, with over 13% annual average minimum wage increases, so that the minimum wage will reach 40% or more of the average wages of local urban workers.
According to China’s “Minimum Wage Regulations”, the minimum wage of every region must be adjusted at least once every two years.
According to a Lhasa Evening News report, the Tibet Autonomous Region released in February the “Tibet Autonomous Region Minimum Wage Regulations” requiring that the minimum wage be timely adjusted when change occurs in the factors used to determine the minimum wage. The minimum wage must be adjusted at least once every two years.
According to a Hebei Youth Daily report, Hebei Province will timely formulate and release guidance on the minimum wage and wage growth this year. Preliminary considerations have the minimum wage to be adjusted upward no less than 15% to progressively reach 40% of the average wages of local urban workers. It is reported that the last adjustment in Hebei was made 2011 July 1st. (China News Service Finance Channel)
Caesar’s Achievements were Caesar’s, Jobs’ were Jobs’
It is found by the reporter via his exposure to college campuses, government officials and entrepreneurs that these groups of people often consciously or unconsciously speak more truth.
The Deputy Director of the Chinese Development and Reform Commission Zhang Xiaoqiang states that in 2011 China consumed 50% of the world’s steel, cement and 20% of the world’s energy while its GDP only accounted for 9.5% share of the world’s economy.
China has become the largest country for carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide emission in the world due to the fact that 70% of China’s energy comes from coal. The current way that China needs large quantities of natural resources for its development is unsustainable.
The seven major industries that China is focusing on developing have accounted for less than 4% of China’s GDP in 2010 and are striving to take an about 8% share in 2015 and around 15% share in 2020.
But Zhang Xiaoqiang also points out that the current system has not yet met the requirements of innovation or developing new industries and it is because Chinese enterprises have not become the drivers of innovation. In 2010, the R&D investment for large and medium-sized industrial enterprises was only at 0.9% of their main business revenue which was far behind the 5% of R&D investment of large enterprises in developed countries. China has not yet formed proper mechanisms of integrating manufacturing, learning and R&D. Additionally, only about one-tenth of China’s scientific research achievements can be converted to industrial applications.
The Vice Minister from Ministry of Science and Technology Zhang Laiwu thinks that China has now reached historical crossroads. Two extreme views are existing. There is strong theoretical support that makes people hard to deny raised by the same person who forecasted the U.S. financial crisis (in 2008) that China is in line for a hard landing in 2013. However, others are saying China will overtake the United States and the time is already predicted to be 2018 which is also considered authoritative.
Zhang indirectly responded to the two views by saying that China’s economy is developing rapidly and a lot of people have blind faith in the government forces. Wasn’t Chinese government strong 30 years ago? It was because of the immature market that it was necessary for the government to intervene however, it can not be always done this way. Government is not the main force of innovation, the market and entrepreneurs are. The Chinese government should first of all deepen the reform to drive the market to a mature level while forego certain power.
Even if the government acts properly, the Angel investor Xue Manzi says, venture failure is inevitable, otherwise it would be “Li Yanhong” everywhere. Success is accidental and it requires enduring efforts, high intelligence and luck at the end.
This article is originally from China entrepreneur magazine in Chinese.
订阅：
博文 (Atom)